Kan vs Super Productivity
Learn how Kan and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.
Learn how Kan and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.
Kan
Auto-fetched .
Super Productivity
Stars
18,816Forks
1,632Last commit
3 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsLicense
MIT
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Kan, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Kan, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Kan in community adoption with 18,816 stars compared to 4,662 stars on GitHub. This 4.0x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,632 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 4 days ago and Super Productivity 3 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Next.js while Super Productivity leverages SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Project Maturity
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Kan which began 2 years ago. This 6.9-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kan's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Project Management Suites while Super Productivity extends into Time Tracking, Project & Work Management.
Hosting & Deployment
Kan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.