Kan vs Super Productivity

Super Productivity significantly outpaces Kan in community adoption with 22,064 stars compared to 5,645 stars on GitHub. This 3.9x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 2,050 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Kan is growing faster, adding 291 stars in the last 30 days (+5.4%) against adding 666 stars for Super Productivity (+3.1%). Kan is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 1 day ago and Super Productivity 2 days ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Next.js while Super Productivity leverages SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB.

Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 6.9-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.

Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kan's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Project Management Suites while Super Productivity extends into Time Tracking, Project & Work Management.

Both Kan and Super Productivity offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.