Macro Tasks vs Super Productivity

Super Productivity significantly outpaces Macro Tasks in community adoption with 21,807 stars compared to 4,199 stars on GitHub. This 5.2x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 2,012 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Macro Tasks is growing faster, adding 3,452 stars in the last 30 days (+462%) against adding 667 stars for Super Productivity (+3.2%). Macro Tasks is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Macro Tasks last updated 5 hours ago and Super Productivity 12 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Macro Tasks uses Python, Rust, C, Tauri while Super Productivity leverages SCSS, Java, Ruby, MATLAB.

Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Macro Tasks which began 10 months ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.

Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Macro Tasks's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity extends into Time Tracking, Project & Work Management.

Super Productivity provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro Tasks may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.