What is the main difference between Macro Tasks and Super Productivity?

Macro Tasks and Super Productivity are both task management tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Macro Tasks or Super Productivity?

The choice between Macro Tasks and Super Productivity depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Macro Tasks to Super Productivity?

Migration between Macro Tasks and Super Productivity is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn More

Macro Tasks vs Super Productivity

Learn how Macro Tasks and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.

Macro Tasks

Task manager built for engineering teams, combining status tracking, priority management, GitHub integration, and AI agents that can close tasks automatically.

Visit Macro Tasks Read more

4,686stars+358(+8.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
11 months
Version
v2026.10.15.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Super Productivity

Privacy-first task manager combining task lists, Kanban, Pomodoro timers, time tracking, and integrations with GitHub, GitLab, and Jira. No account required, works offline.

Visit Super Productivity Read more

22,855stars+808(+3.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
v19.2.0
License
MIT
Repository
super-productivity

Detailed Comparison

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Macro Tasks, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Super Productivity wins

Community & Popularity

Super Productivity significantly outpaces Macro Tasks in community adoption with 22,855 stars compared to 4,686 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 2,157 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Macro Tasks wins

Growth Momentum

Macro Tasks is growing faster, adding 358 stars in the last 30 days (+8.3%) against adding 808 stars for Super Productivity (+3.7%). Macro Tasks is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Macro Tasks last updated 3 hours ago and Super Productivity 3 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Macro Tasks uses Python, Rust, C, Tauri while Super Productivity leverages SCSS, Java, Ruby, MATLAB.

Super Productivity wins

Project Maturity

Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Macro Tasks which began 11 months ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.

Super Productivity wins

Licensing

Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Macro Tasks's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity extends into Time Tracking.