Learn how Macro Tasks and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Macro Tasks, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Macro Tasks in community adoption with 20,862 stars compared to 614 stars on GitHub. This 34.0x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,888 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Macro Tasks last updated 6 hours ago and Super Productivity 4 hours ago.
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Macro Tasks which began 9 months ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Macro Tasks's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity extends into Time Tracking, Project & Work Management.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
License
Repository