Learn how Kanri and Macro Tasks differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.8.2License
GPL-3.0Repository
kanriapp/kanri
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2026.11.3.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
macro-inc/macro
Both Kanri and Macro Tasks have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Macro Tasks leads in popularity with 6,142 stars vs 2,085 stars for Kanri. The 195% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Macro Tasks has 571 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Macro Tasks is growing faster, adding 1,583 stars in the last 30 days (+35%) against adding 35 stars for Kanri (+1.7%). Macro Tasks is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kanri last updated 2 days ago and Macro Tasks 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Rust, Tauri. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kanri uses Vue, Nuxt.js while Macro Tasks leverages Bash, JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin.
Kanri has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Macro Tasks which began 1 year ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Kanri may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Kanri is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Macro Tasks uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kanri also focuses on Agile Project Management.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs