What is the main difference between Leantime and Macro Tasks?

Leantime and Macro Tasks are both task management tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Leantime or Macro Tasks?

The choice between Leantime and Macro Tasks depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Leantime to Macro Tasks?

Migration between Leantime and Macro Tasks is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Leantime vs Macro Tasks

Learn how Leantime and Macro Tasks differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.

Leantime

Open-source software designed to streamline tasks, boost productivity, and enhance collaboration for teams of all types, including those with ADHD and neurodiversity.

Visit Leantime Read more

11,657stars+207(+1.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
12 years
Version
v3.10.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
leantime/leantime

Sponsor Leantime ongithub.com

Macro Tasks

Task manager built for engineering teams, combining status tracking, priority management, GitHub integration, and AI agents that can close tasks automatically.

Visit Macro Tasks Read more

4,393stars+344(+8.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
13 hours ago
Repository age
11 months
Version
v2026.9.24.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Detailed Comparison

Leantime appears to have several advantages over Macro Tasks, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Leantime wins

Community & Popularity

Leantime leads in popularity with 11,657 stars vs 4,393 stars for Macro Tasks. The 165% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 1,133 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Macro Tasks wins

Growth Momentum

Macro Tasks is growing faster, adding 344 stars in the last 30 days (+8.5%) against adding 207 stars for Leantime (+1.8%). Macro Tasks is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Leantime last updated 1 day ago and Macro Tasks 13 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses PHP, Laravel while Macro Tasks leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.

Leantime wins

Project Maturity

Leantime has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Macro Tasks which began 11 months ago. This 10.9-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Leantime also focuses on Project Management Suites.

Leantime wins

Hosting & Deployment

Leantime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro Tasks may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.