Learn how Leantime and Sayr differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
v3.13.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
leantime/leantime
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.8.3Self-hosted
YesRepository
dorasto/sayr
Leantime appears to have several advantages over Sayr, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Leantime significantly outpaces Sayr in community adoption with 12,025 stars compared to 31 stars on GitHub. This 387.9x difference suggests Leantime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 1,173 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Leantime last updated 18 hours ago and Sayr 19 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses PHP, Laravel while Sayr leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Tanstack Start.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Sayr which began 1 year ago. This 10.7-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Leantime is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Sayr's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Leantime also focuses on Task Management while Sayr extends into Feedback & Feature Request Management.
Both Leantime and Sayr offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs