Learn how Leantime and Plane differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.

Both Leantime and Plane have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plane significantly outpaces Leantime in community adoption with 55,415 stars compared to 11,200 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Plane has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plane has 5,202 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Leantime last updated 2 days ago and Plane 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses PHP, Laravel while Plane leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Plane which began 4 years ago. This 7.9-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Leantime also focuses on Task Management while Plane extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Agile Project Management.
Both Leantime and Plane offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository