Learn how Leantime and Vikunja differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Leantime and Vikunja have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Leantime leads in popularity with 11,437 stars vs 5,157 stars for Vikunja. The 122% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 1,113 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Vikunja is growing faster, adding 265 stars in the last 30 days (+5.4%) against adding 344 stars for Leantime (+3.1%). Vikunja is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Leantime last updated 10 days ago and Vikunja 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses CSS, PHP, Laravel while Vikunja leverages Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Golang, Vue.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Vikunja which began 8 years ago. This 3.9-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.
Both Leantime and Vikunja offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs