Learn how Leantime and Vikunja differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Leantime and Vikunja have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Leantime leads in popularity with 11,317 stars vs 5,047 stars for Vikunja. The 124% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 1,103 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Vikunja is growing faster, adding 302 stars in the last 30 days (+6.4%) against adding 609 stars for Leantime (+5.7%). Vikunja is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Leantime last updated 2 days ago and Vikunja 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses CSS, PHP, Laravel while Vikunja leverages Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Golang, Vue.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Vikunja which began 8 years ago. This 3.9-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.
Both Leantime and Vikunja offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs