Learn how Kan and Vikunja differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v2.7.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
go-vikunja/vikunja
Vikunja appears to have several advantages over Kan, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Kan and Vikunja show comparable community engagement with 5,844 and 5,872 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Vikunja has 782 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Vikunja is growing faster, adding 341 stars in the last 30 days (+6.2%) against adding 142 stars for Kan (+2.5%). Vikunja is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 7 days ago and Vikunja 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses CSS, JSX, Next.js while Vikunja leverages Golang, SCSS, Vue.
Vikunja has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 5.0-year head start suggests Vikunja may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.
Both Kan and Vikunja offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs