Learn how Kan and Windshift differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
11 monthsVersion
v0.9.3License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
windshiftapp/core
Both Kan and Windshift have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Kan significantly outpaces Windshift in community adoption with 5,877 stars compared to 402 stars on GitHub. This 14.6x difference suggests Kan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Kan has 532 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Windshift is growing faster, adding 83 stars in the last 30 days (+26%) against adding 147 stars for Kan (+2.6%). Windshift is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 11 hours ago and Windshift 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Next.js while Windshift leverages Python, Golang, Tauri.
Kan has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Windshift which began 11 months ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Kan may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Task Management.
Both Kan and Windshift offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs