Ad
 
Learn more

Huly vs Kan

Learn how Huly and Kan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Huly

Huly

Combines project management, team chat, virtual office, and collaborative docs into a single platform. A self-hostable alternative to Linear, Jira, Slack, and Notion.
  • Stars


    26,103
  • Forks


    1,926
  • Last commit


    15 hours ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
  • License


    EPL-2.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Huly
Favicon of Kan

Kan

Free kanban project management with unlimited boards, lists, and cards. Import Trello boards, collaborate with teams, and self-host for complete control.
  • Stars


    4,943
  • Forks


    371
  • Last commit


    4 days ago
  • Repository age


    3 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Kan

Detailed Comparison

Huly appears to have several advantages over Kan, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Huly wins
Community & Popularity

Huly significantly outpaces Kan in community adoption with 26,103 stars compared to 4,943 stars on GitHub. This 5.3x difference suggests Huly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Huly has 1,926 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Huly last updated 15 hours ago and Kan 4 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Huly uses Python, SCSS while Kan leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js.

Huly wins
Project Maturity

Huly has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Huly may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 while Kan uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Huly also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office while Kan extends into Task Management.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Huly and Kan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.