Huly significantly outpaces Kan in community adoption with 27,208 stars compared to 5,296 stars on GitHub. This 5.1x difference suggests Huly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Huly has 2,071 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with Huly last updated 12 hours ago and Kan 18 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Huly uses Python, SCSS while Kan leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js.

Huly has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Huly may have more mature features and established processes.

The projects use different licenses: Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 while Kan uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Huly also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office while Kan extends into Task Management.

Both Huly and Kan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.