Learn how Huly and OpenProject differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Huly and OpenProject have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Huly leads in popularity with 25,446 stars vs 14,907 stars for OpenProject. The 71% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,207 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Huly last updated 14 hours ago and OpenProject 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Huly uses Python while OpenProject leverages CSS, JSX, Ruby, Perl.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Huly which began 5 years ago. This 8.8-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 while OpenProject uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Huly also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office while OpenProject extends into Agile Project Management.
OpenProject provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Huly may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs