Learn how OpenProject and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

OpenProject appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenProject significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 15,912 stars compared to 3,150 stars on GitHub. This 5.1x difference suggests OpenProject has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,439 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenProject is growing faster, adding 256 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 36 stars for Worklenz (+1.2%). OpenProject is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenProject last updated 17 hours ago and Worklenz 13 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenProject uses Ruby, Perl.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 11.6-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenProject is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Worklenz uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenProject also focuses on Agile Project Management while Worklenz extends into Task Management.
OpenProject provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs