OpenProject vs Worklenz

OpenProject significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 14,905 stars compared to 3,022 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests OpenProject has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,207 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

OpenProject shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Worklenz was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests OpenProject is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenProject uses Ruby, Perl.

OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 11.6-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.

The projects use different licenses: OpenProject is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Worklenz uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenProject also focuses on Agile Project Management while Worklenz extends into Task Management.

OpenProject provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.