Learn how Manage and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Both Manage and Worklenz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Worklenz significantly outpaces Manage in community adoption with 3,103 stars compared to 63 stars on GitHub. This 49.3x difference suggests Worklenz has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Worklenz has 335 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Worklenz shows more recent development activity with its last commit 14 days ago, while Manage was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Worklenz is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Manage uses Next.js while Worklenz leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Manage beginning 3 years ago and Worklenz 2 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.
Manage provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs