Learn how Ever Teams and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.146.57License
AGPL-3.0Repository
ever-co/ever-teams
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.3.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
worklenz/worklenz
Both Ever Teams and Worklenz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Worklenz significantly outpaces Ever Teams in community adoption with 3,275 stars compared to 598 stars on GitHub. This 5.5x difference suggests Worklenz has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Worklenz has 386 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Worklenz is growing faster, adding 84 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 10 stars for Ever Teams (+1.7%). Worklenz is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ever Teams last updated 10 hours ago and Worklenz 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ever Teams uses Next.js while Worklenz leverages SCSS.
Ever Teams has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Ever Teams may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ever Teams also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Time Tracking while Worklenz extends into Task Management.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs