Learn how Huly and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.3.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
worklenz/worklenz
Huly appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Huly significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 27,998 stars compared to 3,275 stars on GitHub. This 8.5x difference suggests Huly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Huly has 2,187 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Worklenz is growing faster, adding 84 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 208 stars for Huly (+0.7%). Worklenz is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Huly last updated 1 day ago and Worklenz 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Huly uses Python while Worklenz leverages CSS, JSX.
Huly has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Huly may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 while Worklenz uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Huly also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office while Worklenz extends into Task Management.
Huly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs