Learn how Vikunja and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v2.7.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
go-vikunja/vikunja
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.3.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
worklenz/worklenz
Vikunja appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Vikunja leads in popularity with 5,872 stars vs 3,275 stars for Worklenz. The 79% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Vikunja has 782 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Vikunja is growing faster, adding 341 stars in the last 30 days (+6.2%) against adding 84 stars for Worklenz (+2.6%). Vikunja is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Vikunja last updated 9 hours ago and Worklenz 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Vikunja uses Golang, Vue while Worklenz leverages CSS, JSX.
Vikunja has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 5.5-year head start suggests Vikunja may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.
Vikunja provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs