Learn how Planka and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Planka appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Planka significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 12,447 stars compared to 3,150 stars on GitHub. This 4.0x difference suggests Planka has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Planka has 1,364 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Planka is growing faster, adding 176 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 36 stars for Worklenz (+1.2%). Planka is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Planka last updated 14 days ago and Worklenz 13 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Planka uses Python while Worklenz leverages Typescript.
Planka has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests Planka may have more mature features and established processes.
Worklenz is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Planka's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Planka also focuses on Agile Project Management.
Planka provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs