Learn how Planka and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v2.2.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
plankanban/planka
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.3.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
worklenz/worklenz
Both Planka and Worklenz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Planka significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 12,646 stars compared to 3,275 stars on GitHub. This 3.9x difference suggests Planka has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Planka has 1,396 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Worklenz is growing faster, adding 84 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 59 stars for Planka (+0.5%). Worklenz is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Planka last updated 4 days ago and Worklenz 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Planka uses Python while Worklenz leverages Typescript.
Planka has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests Planka may have more mature features and established processes.
Worklenz is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Planka's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Planka also focuses on Agile Project Management.
Planka provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs