Learn how OpenProject and Planka differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenProject appears to have several advantages over Planka, particularly in growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with OpenProject having 16,251 stars and Planka having 12,589 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,517 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenProject is growing faster, adding 280 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 124 stars for Planka (+1%). OpenProject is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenProject last updated 4 hours ago and Planka 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenProject uses Typescript, Ruby, Perl while Planka leverages Python.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Planka which began 7 years ago. This 6.9-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenProject is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Planka's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Agile Project Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Planka extends into Task Management.
Both OpenProject and Planka offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs