Learn how OpenProject and Taiga differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Activity score

Activity score

OpenProject appears to have several advantages over Taiga, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenProject significantly outpaces Taiga in community adoption with 15,391 stars compared to 837 stars on GitHub. This 18.4x difference suggests OpenProject has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,327 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenProject shows more recent development activity with its last commit 9 hours ago, while Taiga was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests OpenProject is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenProject uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Ruby, Perl while Taiga leverages Python, Django.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Taiga which began 5 years ago. This 8.5-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenProject is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Taiga uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Agile Project Management.
Both OpenProject and Taiga offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs