Learn how Fizzy and OpenProject differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these agile project management tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

OpenProject appears to have several advantages over Fizzy, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenProject leads in popularity with 15,225 stars vs 7,806 stars for Fizzy. The 95% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,286 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fizzy last updated 4 days ago and OpenProject 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenProject leverages Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Perl.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Fizzy which began 2 years ago. This 11.7-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenProject is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Fizzy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Agile Project Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Fizzy also focuses on Project & Work Management while OpenProject extends into Project Management Suites.
Both Fizzy and OpenProject offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs