Learn how Fizzy and OpenProject differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these agile project management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenProject appears to have several advantages over Fizzy, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenProject leads in popularity with 16,335 stars vs 8,244 stars for Fizzy. The 98% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,532 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenProject is growing faster, adding 292 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 64 stars for Fizzy (+0.8%). OpenProject is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fizzy last updated 7 hours ago and OpenProject 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenProject leverages Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Perl.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Fizzy which began 2 years ago. This 11.7-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenProject is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Fizzy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Agile Project Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenProject extends into Project Management Suites.
Both Fizzy and OpenProject offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs