Learn how Fizzy and Wekan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project & work management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Wekan appears to have several advantages over Fizzy, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wekan leads in popularity with 21,073 stars vs 8,176 stars for Fizzy. The 158% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Wekan has 3,002 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Fizzy is growing faster, adding 144 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 54 stars for Wekan (+0.3%). Fizzy is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fizzy last updated 1 day ago and Wekan 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fizzy uses Ruby while Wekan leverages Python, SCSS, PHP, Perl, Meteor.
Wekan has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Fizzy which began 2 years ago. This 10.6-year head start suggests Wekan may have more mature features and established processes.
Wekan is licensed under MIT, while Fizzy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project & Work Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Fizzy also focuses on Agile Project Management.
Both Fizzy and Wekan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.