Learn how Fizzy and Wekan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project & work management tools is best for you.

Both Fizzy and Wekan have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wekan leads in popularity with 21,029 stars vs 8,068 stars for Fizzy. The 161% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Wekan has 2,997 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Fizzy is growing faster, adding 114 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 33 stars for Wekan (+0.2%). Fizzy is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fizzy last updated 2 days ago and Wekan 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fizzy uses Ruby while Wekan leverages Python, SCSS, PHP, Perl, Meteor.
Wekan has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Fizzy which began 2 years ago. This 10.6-year head start suggests Wekan may have more mature features and established processes.
Wekan is licensed under MIT, while Fizzy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project & Work Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Fizzy also focuses on Agile Project Management.
Fizzy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Wekan may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository