Learn how Super Productivity and Wekan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project & work management tools is best for you.

Both Super Productivity and Wekan have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Super Productivity and Wekan show comparable community engagement with 21,375 and 21,029 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Wekan has 2,997 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Super Productivity is growing faster, adding 693 stars in the last 30 days (+3.4%) against adding 33 stars for Wekan (+0.2%). Super Productivity is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Super Productivity last updated 19 hours ago and Wekan 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Super Productivity uses Typescript, JSX, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB while Wekan leverages Python, PHP, Perl, Meteor.
Wekan has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Super Productivity which began 10 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Wekan may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project & Work Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity also focuses on Task Management, Time Tracking.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository