Learn how Super Productivity and Wekan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project & work management tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Super Productivity and Wekan have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Super Productivity and Wekan show comparable community engagement with 19,115 and 20,919 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Wekan has 2,973 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Super Productivity last updated 15 hours ago and Wekan 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Super Productivity uses Typescript, JSX, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB while Wekan leverages Python, PHP, Perl, Meteor.
Wekan has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Super Productivity which began 9 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Wekan may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project & Work Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity also focuses on Task Management, Time Tracking.