Learn how Ever Teams and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Ever Teams, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Ever Teams in community adoption with 18,648 stars compared to 499 stars on GitHub. This 37.4x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,613 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ever Teams last updated 1 day ago and Super Productivity 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ever Teams uses Next.js while Super Productivity leverages SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Ever Teams which began 4 years ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Ever Teams's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ever Teams also focuses on Project Management Suites, Collaborative Workspaces while Super Productivity extends into Task Management, Project & Work Management.