Learn how Kimai and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Kimai and Super Productivity have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Kimai in community adoption with 18,966 stars compared to 4,626 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,645 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kimai last updated 1 day ago and Super Productivity 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kimai uses PHP while Super Productivity leverages Typescript, JSX, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Both projects started around the same time, with Kimai beginning 10 years ago and Super Productivity 9 years ago.
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kimai's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kimai also focuses on Freelancer Tools while Super Productivity extends into Task Management, Project & Work Management.
Kimai provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.