What is the main difference between Kimai and TimeTracker?

Kimai and TimeTracker are both time tracking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Kimai or TimeTracker?

The choice between Kimai and TimeTracker depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Kimai to TimeTracker?

Migration between Kimai and TimeTracker is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Kimai vs TimeTracker

Learn how Kimai and TimeTracker differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.

Kimai

Open-source time tracking solution for businesses of all sizes. Manage projects, track billable hours, and generate insightful reports.

Visit Kimai Read more

5,165stars+88(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
20 hours ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
2.72.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
kimai/kimai

TimeTracker

Free open-source time tracking software with 120+ features. Track time, manage projects, generate invoices. Complete data control with Docker deployment.

Visit TimeTracker Read more

644stars+11(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v5.20.0
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
drytrix/timetracker

Detailed Comparison

Kimai appears to have several advantages over TimeTracker, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Kimai wins

Community & Popularity

Kimai significantly outpaces TimeTracker in community adoption with 5,165 stars compared to 644 stars on GitHub. This 8.0x difference suggests Kimai has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Kimai has 888 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Kimai and TimeTracker are moving at much the same rate, adding 88 stars and adding 11 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.7% vs +1.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Kimai last updated 20 hours ago and TimeTracker 7 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kimai uses SCSS, PHP while TimeTracker leverages JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Java, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart.

Kimai wins

Project Maturity

Kimai has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to TimeTracker which began 1 year ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests Kimai may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Kimai is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while TimeTracker uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kimai also focuses on Freelancer Tools.

Comparable