What is the main difference between SolidTime and TimeTracker?

SolidTime and TimeTracker are both time tracking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: SolidTime or TimeTracker?

The choice between SolidTime and TimeTracker depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from SolidTime to TimeTracker?

Migration between SolidTime and TimeTracker is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

SolidTime vs TimeTracker

Learn how SolidTime and TimeTracker differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.

SolidTime

Seamlessly track time across multiple projects, generate insightful reports, and optimize your open source contributions.

Visit SolidTime Read more

9,133stars+124(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v0.22.1
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
solidtime

TimeTracker

Free open-source time tracking software with 120+ features. Track time, manage projects, generate invoices. Complete data control with Docker deployment.

Visit TimeTracker Read more

644stars+11(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v5.20.0
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
drytrix/timetracker

Detailed Comparison

Both SolidTime and TimeTracker have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

SolidTime wins

Community & Popularity

SolidTime significantly outpaces TimeTracker in community adoption with 9,133 stars compared to 644 stars on GitHub. This 14.2x difference suggests SolidTime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SolidTime has 538 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

TimeTracker wins

Growth Momentum

TimeTracker is growing faster, adding 11 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 124 stars for SolidTime (+1.4%). TimeTracker is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with SolidTime last updated 2 days ago and TimeTracker 7 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SolidTime uses Typescript, PHP, Vue, Laravel while TimeTracker leverages JSX, Python, C, Objective-C, Java, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart.

SolidTime wins

Project Maturity

SolidTime has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to TimeTracker which began 1 year ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests SolidTime may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: SolidTime is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while TimeTracker uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable