Learn how SolidTime and TimeTracker differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v5.18.3License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
drytrix/timetracker
SolidTime appears to have several advantages over TimeTracker, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SolidTime significantly outpaces TimeTracker in community adoption with 9,030 stars compared to 634 stars on GitHub. This 14.2x difference suggests SolidTime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SolidTime has 519 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
SolidTime and TimeTracker are moving at much the same rate, adding 98 stars and adding 6 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.1% vs +1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with SolidTime last updated 5 days ago and TimeTracker 1 day ago.
SolidTime has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to TimeTracker which began 1 year ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests SolidTime may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: SolidTime is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while TimeTracker uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking.
Both SolidTime and TimeTracker offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.