Learn how Hackatime and SolidTime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Hackatime and SolidTime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SolidTime significantly outpaces Hackatime in community adoption with 8,461 stars compared to 119 stars on GitHub. This 71.1x difference suggests SolidTime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SolidTime has 438 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hackatime last updated 15 hours ago and SolidTime 1 day ago.
SolidTime has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Hackatime which began 1 year ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests SolidTime may have more mature features and established processes.
Hackatime uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SolidTime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: SolidTime extends into Developer Tools.
Both Hackatime and SolidTime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.