Hackatime vs SolidTime
Learn how Hackatime and SolidTime differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Learn how Hackatime and SolidTime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Hackatime
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
hackclub/hackatime
SolidTime
Last 30 days
Detailed Comparison
Both Hackatime and SolidTime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Hackatime and SolidTime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
SolidTime significantly outpaces Hackatime in community adoption with 9,116 stars compared to 216 stars on GitHub. This 42.2x difference suggests SolidTime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SolidTime has 534 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Hackatime and SolidTime are moving at much the same rate, adding 3 stars and adding 132 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Hackatime last updated 9 hours ago and SolidTime 19 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hackatime uses Ruby while SolidTime leverages PHP, Vue, Laravel.
Project Maturity
SolidTime has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Hackatime which began 2 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests SolidTime may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Hackatime uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SolidTime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Hackatime and SolidTime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.