What is the main difference between Hackatime and SolidTime?

Hackatime and SolidTime are both time tracking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Hackatime or SolidTime?

The choice between Hackatime and SolidTime depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Hackatime to SolidTime?

Migration between Hackatime and SolidTime is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Learn more

Hackatime vs SolidTime

Learn how Hackatime and SolidTime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.

Hackatime

Free, open-source coding time tracker compatible with VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, vim, emacs and more. No limits, no paywalls - your data stays yours forever.

Visit Hackatime Read more

Stars
155
Forks
139
Last commit
1 hour ago
Repository age
1 year
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

64/100

View Repository

SolidTime

Seamlessly track time across multiple projects, generate insightful reports, and optimize your open source contributions.

Visit SolidTime Read more

Stars
8,761
Forks
474
Last commit
21 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

90/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Both Hackatime and SolidTime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

SolidTime wins

Community & Popularity

SolidTime significantly outpaces Hackatime in community adoption with 8,761 stars compared to 155 stars on GitHub. This 56.5x difference suggests SolidTime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SolidTime has 474 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Hackatime last updated 1 hour ago and SolidTime 21 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hackatime uses Ruby while SolidTime leverages Vue, PHP, Laravel.

SolidTime wins

Project Maturity

SolidTime has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Hackatime which began 1 year ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests SolidTime may have more mature features and established processes.

Hackatime wins

Licensing

Hackatime uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SolidTime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable