Learn how Hackatime and SolidTime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Hackatime and SolidTime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SolidTime significantly outpaces Hackatime in community adoption with 8,598 stars compared to 133 stars on GitHub. This 64.6x difference suggests SolidTime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SolidTime has 450 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hackatime last updated 14 hours ago and SolidTime 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hackatime uses Ruby while SolidTime leverages Vue, PHP, Laravel.
SolidTime has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Hackatime which began 1 year ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests SolidTime may have more mature features and established processes.
Hackatime uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SolidTime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking.
Both Hackatime and SolidTime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.