Learn how Ever Teams and SolidTime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Ever Teams and SolidTime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SolidTime significantly outpaces Ever Teams in community adoption with 8,861 stars compared to 544 stars on GitHub. This 16.3x difference suggests SolidTime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SolidTime has 499 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Ever Teams is growing faster, adding 26 stars in the last 30 days (+5%) against adding 63 stars for SolidTime (+0.7%). Ever Teams is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ever Teams last updated 1 day ago and SolidTime 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ever Teams uses JSX, Next.js while SolidTime leverages Vue, PHP, Laravel.
Ever Teams has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to SolidTime which began 3 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Ever Teams may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ever Teams also focuses on Project Management Suites, Collaborative Workspaces.
SolidTime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Ever Teams may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs