Learn how Ever Teams and SolidTime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Ever Teams and SolidTime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SolidTime significantly outpaces Ever Teams in community adoption with 8,906 stars compared to 546 stars on GitHub. This 16.3x difference suggests SolidTime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SolidTime has 509 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Ever Teams and SolidTime are moving at much the same rate, adding 3 stars and adding 60 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ever Teams last updated 16 hours ago and SolidTime 16 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ever Teams uses JSX, Next.js while SolidTime leverages Vue, PHP, Laravel.
Ever Teams has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to SolidTime which began 3 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Ever Teams may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ever Teams also focuses on Project Management Suites, Collaborative Workspaces.
SolidTime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Ever Teams may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs