Learn how Kimai and SolidTime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Kimai and SolidTime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SolidTime leads in popularity with 8,906 stars vs 4,964 stars for Kimai. The 79% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Kimai has 843 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Kimai is growing faster, adding 92 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 60 stars for SolidTime (+0.7%). Kimai is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kimai last updated 2 days ago and SolidTime 16 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kimai uses SCSS while SolidTime leverages Typescript, Vue, Laravel.
Kimai has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to SolidTime which began 3 years ago. This 7.3-year head start suggests Kimai may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kimai also focuses on Freelancer Tools.
Both Kimai and SolidTime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.