Learn how Kimai and SolidTime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
2.71.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
kimai/kimai
Last 30 days

Both Kimai and SolidTime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SolidTime leads in popularity with 9,116 stars vs 5,143 stars for Kimai. The 77% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Kimai has 882 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Kimai and SolidTime are moving at much the same rate, adding 78 stars and adding 132 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.5% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kimai last updated 2 days ago and SolidTime 19 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kimai uses SCSS while SolidTime leverages Typescript, Vue, Laravel.
Kimai has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to SolidTime which began 3 years ago. This 7.3-year head start suggests Kimai may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kimai also focuses on Freelancer Tools.
Both Kimai and SolidTime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.