Ad
 
Learn More

SolidTime vs Wakapi

Learn how SolidTime and Wakapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of SolidTime

SolidTime

Seamlessly track time across multiple projects, generate insightful reports, and optimize your open source contributions.
9,015stars+88(+1%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit


    5 days ago
  • Repository age


    3 years
  • Version


    v0.21.0
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
  • Repository


    solidtime
Screenshot of SolidTime
Favicon of Wakapi

Wakapi

Open-source, self-hosted time tracking solution for developers. Analyze coding habits, improve productivity, and visualize progress.
4,455stars+23(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit


    18 hours ago
  • Repository age


    7 years
  • Version


    2.18.2
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
  • Repository


    muety/wakapi
Screenshot of Wakapi

Detailed Comparison

Both SolidTime and Wakapi have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

SolidTime wins
Community & Popularity

SolidTime leads in popularity with 9,015 stars vs 4,455 stars for Wakapi. The 102% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, SolidTime has 516 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

SolidTime wins
Growth Momentum

SolidTime is growing faster, adding 88 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 23 stars for Wakapi (+0.5%). SolidTime is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with SolidTime last updated 5 days ago and Wakapi 18 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SolidTime uses CSS, Typescript, PHP, Vue, Laravel while Wakapi leverages Python, Golang.

Wakapi wins
Project Maturity

Wakapi has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to SolidTime which began 3 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests Wakapi may have more mature features and established processes.

Wakapi wins
Licensing

Wakapi uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SolidTime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both SolidTime and Wakapi offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.