Learn how SolidTime and Wakapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both SolidTime and Wakapi have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SolidTime leads in popularity with 8,861 stars vs 4,405 stars for Wakapi. The 101% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, SolidTime has 499 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
SolidTime and Wakapi are moving at much the same rate, adding 63 stars and adding 33 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.7% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with SolidTime last updated 2 days ago and Wakapi 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SolidTime uses CSS, Typescript, Vue, PHP, Laravel while Wakapi leverages Python, Golang.
Wakapi has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to SolidTime which began 3 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests Wakapi may have more mature features and established processes.
Wakapi uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SolidTime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking.
Both SolidTime and Wakapi offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.