Learn how Wakapi and Ziit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 4 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Wakapi appears to have several advantages over Ziit, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wakapi significantly outpaces Ziit in community adoption with 4,274 stars compared to 221 stars on GitHub. This 19.3x difference suggests Wakapi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wakapi has 283 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Wakapi shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Ziit was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Wakapi is being more actively maintained.
Wakapi uses JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang while Ziit leverages Typescript, SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js.
Wakapi has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Ziit which began 1 year ago. This 6.0-year head start suggests Wakapi may have more mature features and established processes.
Wakapi uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Ziit's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ziit extends into Productivity & Utilities.
Both Wakapi and Ziit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.