ActivityWatch vs Ziit
Learn how ActivityWatch and Ziit differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Learn how ActivityWatch and Ziit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
ActivityWatch
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v0.13.2License
MPL-2.0Repository
activitywatch/activitywatch
Ziit
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 months agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v1.1.3License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
0pandadev/ziit
Detailed Comparison
Both ActivityWatch and Ziit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both ActivityWatch and Ziit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
ActivityWatch significantly outpaces Ziit in community adoption with 18,642 stars compared to 249 stars on GitHub. This 74.9x difference suggests ActivityWatch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ActivityWatch has 984 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Ziit is growing faster, adding 6 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 346 stars for ActivityWatch (+1.9%). Ziit is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
ActivityWatch shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while Ziit was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests ActivityWatch is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
ActivityWatch uses Bash, Python while Ziit leverages Typescript, SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js.
Project Maturity
ActivityWatch has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Ziit which began 1 year ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests ActivityWatch may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: ActivityWatch is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Ziit uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking, Productivity & Utilities.
Hosting & Deployment
Ziit provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ActivityWatch may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.