ActivityWatch vs Ziit
Learn how ActivityWatch and Ziit differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Learn how ActivityWatch and Ziit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
ActivityWatch
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v0.14.1License
MPL-2.0Repository
activitywatch
Ziit
Last 30 days
Last commit
17 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.2.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
0pandadev/ziit
Detailed Comparison
ActivityWatch appears to have several advantages over Ziit, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ActivityWatch appears to have several advantages over Ziit, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
ActivityWatch significantly outpaces Ziit in community adoption with 19,553 stars compared to 258 stars on GitHub. This 75.8x difference suggests ActivityWatch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ActivityWatch has 1,076 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
ActivityWatch is growing faster, adding 397 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 3 stars for Ziit (+1.2%). ActivityWatch is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with ActivityWatch last updated 2 days ago and Ziit 17 days ago.
Technology Stack
ActivityWatch uses Bash, Python while Ziit leverages Typescript, SCSS, Vue, Nuxt.js.
Project Maturity
ActivityWatch has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Ziit which began 2 years ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests ActivityWatch may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: ActivityWatch is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Ziit uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking.
Hosting & Deployment
Ziit provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ActivityWatch may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.