ActivityWatch vs TimeScribe
Learn how ActivityWatch and TimeScribe differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Learn how ActivityWatch and TimeScribe differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
ActivityWatch
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v0.14.1License
MPL-2.0Repository
activitywatch
TimeScribe
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.18.0License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
winbigfox/timescribe
Detailed Comparison
Both ActivityWatch and TimeScribe have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both ActivityWatch and TimeScribe have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
ActivityWatch significantly outpaces TimeScribe in community adoption with 19,553 stars compared to 933 stars on GitHub. This 21.0x difference suggests ActivityWatch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ActivityWatch has 1,076 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
ActivityWatch and TimeScribe are moving at much the same rate, adding 397 stars and adding 19 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2.1% vs +2.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with ActivityWatch last updated 2 days ago and TimeScribe 5 days ago.
Technology Stack
ActivityWatch uses Bash, Python while TimeScribe leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, PHP, Vue, Laravel.
Project Maturity
ActivityWatch has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to TimeScribe which began 2 years ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests ActivityWatch may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: ActivityWatch is licensed under MPL-2.0 while TimeScribe uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking.
Hosting & Deployment
TimeScribe provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ActivityWatch may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.