ActivityWatch vs Hackatime
Learn how ActivityWatch and Hackatime differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Learn how ActivityWatch and Hackatime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
ActivityWatch
Stars
17,317Forks
873Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
10 yearsLicense
MPL-2.0
Auto-fetched .
Hackatime
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Both ActivityWatch and Hackatime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both ActivityWatch and Hackatime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
ActivityWatch significantly outpaces Hackatime in community adoption with 17,317 stars compared to 119 stars on GitHub. This 145.5x difference suggests ActivityWatch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ActivityWatch has 873 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with ActivityWatch last updated 3 days ago and Hackatime 14 hours ago.
Project Maturity
ActivityWatch has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Hackatime which began 1 year ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests ActivityWatch may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Hackatime uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than ActivityWatch's MPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: ActivityWatch also focuses on Productivity & Utilities.
Hosting & Deployment
Hackatime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ActivityWatch may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.