Learn how Hackatime and Wakapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Wakapi appears to have several advantages over Hackatime, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wakapi significantly outpaces Hackatime in community adoption with 4,322 stars compared to 133 stars on GitHub. This 32.5x difference suggests Wakapi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wakapi has 289 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hackatime last updated 14 hours ago and Wakapi 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hackatime uses CSS, Typescript, Ruby while Wakapi leverages Python, Golang.
Wakapi has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hackatime which began 1 year ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Wakapi may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking.
Both Hackatime and Wakapi offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.