Learn how Hackatime and Wakapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.

Wakapi appears to have several advantages over Hackatime, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wakapi significantly outpaces Hackatime in community adoption with 4,387 stars compared to 175 stars on GitHub. This 25.1x difference suggests Wakapi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wakapi has 294 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hackatime last updated 4 hours ago and Wakapi 8 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hackatime uses CSS, Typescript, Ruby while Wakapi leverages Python, Golang.
Wakapi has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hackatime which began 1 year ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Wakapi may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking.
Both Hackatime and Wakapi offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository