Learn how Hackatime and Wakapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Hackatime and Wakapi have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wakapi significantly outpaces Hackatime in community adoption with 4,405 stars compared to 183 stars on GitHub. This 24.1x difference suggests Wakapi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wakapi has 295 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Hackatime is growing faster, adding 25 stars in the last 30 days (+16%) against adding 33 stars for Wakapi (+0.8%). Hackatime is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hackatime last updated 7 hours ago and Wakapi 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hackatime uses CSS, Typescript, Ruby while Wakapi leverages Python, Golang.
Wakapi has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hackatime which began 2 years ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Wakapi may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking.
Both Hackatime and Wakapi offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.