What is the main difference between TimeTracker and Wakapi?

TimeTracker and Wakapi are both time tracking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: TimeTracker or Wakapi?

The choice between TimeTracker and Wakapi depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from TimeTracker to Wakapi?

Migration between TimeTracker and Wakapi is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

TimeTracker vs Wakapi

Learn how TimeTracker and Wakapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.

TimeTracker

Free open-source time tracking software with 120+ features. Track time, manage projects, generate invoices. Complete data control with Docker deployment.

Visit TimeTracker Read more

644stars+11(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v5.20.0
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
drytrix/timetracker

Wakapi

Open-source, self-hosted time tracking solution for developers. Analyze coding habits, improve productivity, and visualize progress.

Visit Wakapi Read more

4,480stars+28(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
2.18.2
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
muety/wakapi

Detailed Comparison

Wakapi appears to have several advantages over TimeTracker, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Wakapi wins

Community & Popularity

Wakapi significantly outpaces TimeTracker in community adoption with 4,480 stars compared to 644 stars on GitHub. This 7.0x difference suggests Wakapi has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wakapi has 315 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

TimeTracker wins

Growth Momentum

TimeTracker is growing faster, adding 11 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 28 stars for Wakapi (+0.6%). TimeTracker is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with TimeTracker last updated 7 hours ago and Wakapi 6 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: TimeTracker uses CSS, JSX, C, Objective-C, Java, Kotlin, MATLAB, Dart while Wakapi leverages Golang.

Wakapi wins

Project Maturity

Wakapi has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to TimeTracker which began 1 year ago. This 6.3-year head start suggests Wakapi may have more mature features and established processes.

Wakapi wins

Licensing

Wakapi uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than TimeTracker's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable