Learn how Super Productivity and Wakapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Wakapi, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Wakapi in community adoption with 21,454 stars compared to 4,405 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,964 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Super Productivity is growing faster, adding 695 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 33 stars for Wakapi (+0.8%). Super Productivity is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Super Productivity last updated 2 days ago and Wakapi 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Super Productivity uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB while Wakapi leverages Python, Golang.
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Wakapi which began 7 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity also focuses on Task Management, Project & Work Management.
Wakapi provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.