Learn how Super Productivity and Wakapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Activity score

Both Super Productivity and Wakapi have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Wakapi in community adoption with 20,541 stars compared to 4,365 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,842 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Super Productivity last updated 2 hours ago and Wakapi 7 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Super Productivity uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB while Wakapi leverages Python, Golang.
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Wakapi which began 7 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity also focuses on Task Management, Project & Work Management.
Wakapi provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.