Donetick vs Super Productivity
Learn how Donetick and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.
Learn how Donetick and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.
Donetick
Last 30 days
Last commit
24 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.1.79License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
donetick/donetick
Super Productivity
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v18.21.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
johannesjo/super-productivity
Detailed Comparison
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Donetick, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Donetick, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Donetick in community adoption with 21,965 stars compared to 2,545 stars on GitHub. This 8.6x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 2,035 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Super Productivity is growing faster, adding 643 stars in the last 30 days (+3%) against adding 64 stars for Donetick (+2.6%). Super Productivity is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Donetick last updated 24 days ago and Super Productivity 6 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Donetick uses Golang while Super Productivity leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Project Maturity
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Donetick which began 2 years ago. This 7.6-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Donetick's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management, Project & Work Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity extends into Time Tracking.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Donetick and Super Productivity offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Other tool comparisons to consider
Donetickvs
VikunjaSuper Productivityvs
Macro TasksSuper Productivityvs
WekanSuper Productivityvs
PlankaSuper Productivityvs
KaneoSuper Productivityvs
LeantimeSuper Productivityvs
SolidTimeSuper Productivityvs
FizzySuper Productivityvs
KanSuper Productivityvs
VikunjaSuper Productivityvs
KimaiSuper Productivityvs
WakapiSuper Productivityvs
WorklenzSuper Productivityvs
KanriSuper Productivityvs
TimeScribeSuper Productivityvs
FreeterSuper Productivityvs
KanbaSuper Productivityvs
Ever TeamsSuper Productivityvs
Mimrai
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.