Learn how Donetick and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Donetick, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Donetick in community adoption with 18,765 stars compared to 2,082 stars on GitHub. This 9.0x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,623 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Donetick last updated 7 days ago and Super Productivity 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Donetick uses Golang while Super Productivity leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Donetick which began 2 years ago. This 7.6-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Donetick's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management, Project & Work Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity extends into Time Tracking.
Donetick provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.