Ad
 
Learn more

Donetick vs Super Productivity

Learn how Donetick and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Donetick

Donetick

Organize tasks and chores with intelligent scheduling, fair assignment, and collaboration features. Perfect for families and teams with smart notifications.
  • Stars


    2,082
  • Forks


    135
  • Last commit


    7 days ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Donetick
Favicon of Super Productivity

Super Productivity

Open-source task manager combining time tracking, notes, and focus tools. No tracking, full privacy, offline-first. Perfect for developers and professionals.
  • Stars


    18,765
  • Forks


    1,623
  • Last commit


    17 hours ago
  • Repository age


    9 years
  • License


    MIT
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Super Productivity

Detailed Comparison

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Donetick, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Super Productivity wins
Community & Popularity

Super Productivity significantly outpaces Donetick in community adoption with 18,765 stars compared to 2,082 stars on GitHub. This 9.0x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,623 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Donetick last updated 7 days ago and Super Productivity 17 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Donetick uses Golang while Super Productivity leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.

Super Productivity wins
Project Maturity

Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Donetick which began 2 years ago. This 7.6-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.

Super Productivity wins
Licensing

Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Donetick's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management, Project & Work Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity extends into Time Tracking.

Donetick wins
Hosting & Deployment

Donetick provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider