Kanba vs Super Productivity
Learn how Kanba and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project & work management tools is best for you.
Learn how Kanba and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project & work management tools is best for you.
Kanba
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 days agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
1.0.8License
MITRepository
uaghazade1/kanba
Super Productivity
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v18.19.0License
MITRepository
johannesjo/super-productivity
Detailed Comparison
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Kanba, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Kanba, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Kanba in community adoption with 21,476 stars compared to 645 stars on GitHub. This 33.3x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,967 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Super Productivity is growing faster, adding 692 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 11 stars for Kanba (+1.7%). Super Productivity is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Kanba last updated 13 days ago and Super Productivity 3 days ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kanba uses Next.js while Super Productivity leverages Bash, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Project Maturity
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Kanba which began 1 year ago. This 8.6-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project & Work Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity extends into Task Management, Time Tracking.
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.