Super Productivity vs Worklenz

Super Productivity significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 21,532 stars compared to 3,150 stars on GitHub. This 6.8x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,975 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Super Productivity is growing faster, adding 681 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 36 stars for Worklenz (+1.2%). Super Productivity is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Super Productivity last updated 12 hours ago and Worklenz 13 days ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Super Productivity uses Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB.

Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 7.5-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.

Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Worklenz's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity also focuses on Time Tracking, Project & Work Management while Worklenz extends into Project Management Suites.