Super Productivity vs Worklenz
Learn how Super Productivity and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.
Learn how Super Productivity and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.
Super Productivity
Stars
20,609Forks
1,849Last commit
3 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsLicense
MIT
Activity score
Worklenz
Stars
3,103Forks
335Last commit
15 days agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0
Activity score
Detailed Comparison
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 20,609 stars compared to 3,103 stars on GitHub. This 6.6x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,849 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Super Productivity last updated 3 hours ago and Worklenz 15 days ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Super Productivity uses Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Project Maturity
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 7.5-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Worklenz's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity also focuses on Time Tracking, Project & Work Management while Worklenz extends into Project Management Suites.
Other tool comparisons to consider
Super Productivityvs
VikunjaWorklenzvs
PlaneWorklenzvs
HulyWorklenzvs
FocalboardWorklenzvs
OpenProjectWorklenzvs
PlankaWorklenzvs
LeantimeWorklenzvs
KanWorklenzvs
KaneoWorklenzvs
VikunjaWorklenzvs
KanriWorklenzvs
TaigaWorklenzvs
Ever TeamsWorklenzvs
OperatelyWorklenzvs
OrgniseWorklenzvs
ManageWorklenzvs
WindshiftWorklenzvs
MimraiWorklenzvs
Sayr
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.