Learn how Plane and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Plane appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plane significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 48,335 stars compared to 3,022 stars on GitHub. This 16.0x difference suggests Plane has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plane has 4,080 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plane shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 days ago, while Worklenz was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Plane is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plane uses Python, Next.js while Worklenz leverages SCSS.
Plane has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests Plane may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Plane also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Agile Project Management while Worklenz extends into Task Management.
Plane provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs