Learn how Kan and Plane differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v1.4.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
makeplane/plane
Both Kan and Plane have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plane significantly outpaces Kan in community adoption with 61,508 stars compared to 5,844 stars on GitHub. This 10.5x difference suggests Plane has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plane has 6,192 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kan and Plane are moving at much the same rate, adding 142 stars and adding 1,552 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2.5% vs +2.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 7 days ago and Plane 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plane leverages Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Kan beginning 3 years ago and Plane 4 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Task Management while Plane extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Agile Project Management.
Both Kan and Plane offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs