Ad
 
Learn more

Kan vs Plane

Learn how Kan and Plane differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Kan

Kan

Free kanban project management with unlimited boards, lists, and cards. Import Trello boards, collaborate with teams, and self-host for complete control.
  • Stars


    4,662
  • Forks


    327
  • Last commit


    4 days ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Kan
Favicon of Plane

Plane

Collaborative workspace for agile teams to plan, track, and ship projects with customizable workflows and powerful features.
  • Stars


    48,352
  • Forks


    4,084
  • Last commit


    2 days ago
  • Repository age


    3 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Plane

Detailed Comparison

Both Kan and Plane have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Plane wins
Community & Popularity

Plane significantly outpaces Kan in community adoption with 48,352 stars compared to 4,662 stars on GitHub. This 10.4x difference suggests Plane has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plane has 4,084 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 4 days ago and Plane 2 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plane leverages Python.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Kan beginning 2 years ago and Plane 3 years ago.

Comparable
Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Task Management while Plane extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Agile Project Management.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Kan and Plane offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.