Learn how Kan and Redmine differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Kan and Redmine have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Kan and Redmine show comparable community engagement with 5,505 and 6,020 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Redmine has 2,465 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kan is growing faster, adding 244 stars in the last 30 days (+4.6%) against adding 4 stars for Redmine (+0.1%). Kan is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 1 day ago and Redmine 22 hours ago.
Redmine has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 11.1-year head start suggests Redmine may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Kan is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Redmine uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Task Management.
Both Kan and Redmine offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs