Learn how Redmine and Wekan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Redmine and Wekan have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wekan significantly outpaces Redmine in community adoption with 21,093 stars compared to 6,040 stars on GitHub. This 3.5x difference suggests Wekan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wekan has 3,000 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Redmine and Wekan are moving at much the same rate, adding 20 stars and adding 27 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Redmine last updated 12 hours ago and Wekan 44 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Python, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Redmine uses Ruby while Wekan leverages Bash, SCSS, PHP, Meteor.
Redmine has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Wekan which began 13 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Redmine may have more mature features and established processes.
Wekan uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Redmine's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites.
Both Redmine and Wekan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs