Learn how OpenProject and Wekan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both OpenProject and Wekan have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with OpenProject having 16,204 stars and Wekan having 21,093 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,511 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenProject is growing faster, adding 262 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 27 stars for Wekan (+0.1%). OpenProject is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenProject last updated 1 hour ago and Wekan 44 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenProject uses Typescript, JSX, Ruby while Wekan leverages Python, PHP, Meteor.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Wekan which began 13 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
Wekan uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenProject's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenProject also focuses on Agile Project Management.
Both OpenProject and Wekan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs