What is the main difference between Kan and Wekan?

Kan and Wekan are both project management suites but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Kan or Wekan?

The choice between Kan and Wekan depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Kan to Wekan?

Migration between Kan and Wekan is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Windshift – The self-hosted platform that replaces Jira.

Learn More

Kan vs Wekan

Learn how Kan and Wekan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.

Kan

Free kanban project management with unlimited boards, lists, and cards. Import Trello boards, collaborate with teams, and self-host for complete control.

Visit Kan Read more

5,693stars+188(+3.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
3 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
kanbn/kan

Sponsor Kan ongithub.com

Wekan

Open-source Kanban board solution offering visual task management, self-hosting capabilities, and robust security features for teams and individuals.

Visit Wekan Read more

21,094stars+28(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
20 hours ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v12.01
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
wekan/wekan

Sponsor Wekan ongithub.com

Detailed Comparison

Wekan appears to have several advantages over Kan, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Wekan wins

Community & Popularity

Wekan significantly outpaces Kan in community adoption with 21,094 stars compared to 5,693 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests Wekan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wekan has 2,999 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Kan wins

Growth Momentum

Kan is growing faster, adding 188 stars in the last 30 days (+3.4%) against adding 28 stars for Wekan (+0.1%). Kan is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 3 days ago and Wekan 20 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Wekan leverages Python, SCSS, PHP, Perl, Meteor.

Wekan wins

Project Maturity

Wekan has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 9.9-year head start suggests Wekan may have more mature features and established processes.

Wekan wins

Licensing

Wekan uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kan's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Task Management.

Comparable