Learn how Kan and Taiga differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Kan and Taiga have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Kan significantly outpaces Taiga in community adoption with 5,473 stars compared to 847 stars on GitHub. This 6.5x difference suggests Kan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Kan has 451 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Kan is growing faster, adding 225 stars in the last 30 days (+4.3%) against adding 4 stars for Taiga (+0.5%). Kan is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 2 days ago and Taiga 20 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Taiga leverages Python, Django.
Taiga has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 2.6-year head start suggests Taiga may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Kan is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Taiga uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Task Management while Taiga extends into Agile Project Management.
Both Kan and Taiga offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs