Learn how Leantime and Taiga differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.

Leantime appears to have several advantages over Taiga, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Leantime significantly outpaces Taiga in community adoption with 11,200 stars compared to 844 stars on GitHub. This 13.3x difference suggests Leantime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 1,091 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Leantime last updated 3 days ago and Taiga 13 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses JavaScript, PHP, Laravel while Taiga leverages Bash, Python, Django.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Taiga which began 5 years ago. This 6.3-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Leantime is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Taiga uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Leantime also focuses on Task Management while Taiga extends into Agile Project Management.
Both Leantime and Taiga offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Self-hosted
Repository