Learn how Leantime and Redmine differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
v3.12.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
leantime/leantime
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsLicense
GPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
redmine/redmine
Both Leantime and Redmine have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Leantime leads in popularity with 11,913 stars vs 6,062 stars for Redmine. The 97% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Redmine has 2,474 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Leantime is growing faster, adding 245 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 23 stars for Redmine (+0.4%). Leantime is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Leantime last updated 11 hours ago and Redmine 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses PHP, Laravel while Redmine leverages Python, Ruby, Perl.
Redmine has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Leantime which began 12 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Redmine may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Leantime is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Redmine uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Leantime also focuses on Task Management.
Both Leantime and Redmine offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs