Learn how Huly and Redmine differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Huly and Redmine have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Huly significantly outpaces Redmine in community adoption with 27,463 stars compared to 6,020 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests Huly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Redmine has 2,465 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Huly is growing faster, adding 407 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 4 stars for Redmine (+0.1%). Huly is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Huly last updated 16 days ago and Redmine 22 hours ago.
Redmine has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Huly which began 5 years ago. This 8.8-year head start suggests Redmine may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 while Redmine uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Huly also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office.
Both Huly and Redmine offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs